| Summary: | Please, update PPL to version 0.11, it's required by GCC 4.6.0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Artem S. Tashkinov <aros> |
| Component: | ppl | Assignee: | Roberto Bagnara <bagnara> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | aravindvijayan224185, bagnara, jorn.amundsen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-09-05 07:24:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-02-01 11:23:46 UTC
My plan was to first release PPL 0.11.1 and then package it. Please let me know if this is acceptable or if you prefer a PPL 0.11 package superseded a couple of weeks later by a PPL 0.11.1 package. It's really up to you to decide. I've found a patch/hack which you made to avoid PPL 0.11 dependency: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=gcc.git;a=blob_plain;f=gcc46-ppl-0.10.patch;hb=HEAD I'm going to use it too, so this issue is not urgent. In PPL 0.11, the PPL C interface library depends on the main C++ library *and* the PWL library:
kongull:x86_64$ ldd /usr/lib64/libppl_c.so.4.0.0
libppl.so.9 => /usr/lib64/libppl.so.9 (0x00002b74d7d69000)
libpwl.so.5 => /usr/lib64/libpwl.so.5 (0x00002b74d805d000)
libgmpxx.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libgmpxx.so.4 (0x00002b74d8261000)
libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libgmp.so.3 (0x00002b74d8466000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002b74d86bb000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b74d89bb000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b74d8c3f000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002b74d8f95000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003a67c00000)
With the 0.10.2 RPM, C and C++ is in the main package. So, probably, a c subpackage must be made to handle this dependency, probably also a c-devel and perhaps a c-docs !?
|