Bug 674534

Summary:	oddjob init script returns wrong code for nonexist action
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Yulia Kopkova <ykopkova>
Component:	oddjob	Assignee:	Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.1	CC:	dpal, mkhusid, zmraz
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	oddjob-0.30-4.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	756953 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-03-10 07:51:08 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	756953

Description Yulia Kopkova 2011-02-02 10:57:57 UTC

Description of problem:
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript oddjob 
component init script should return code "2" on nonexist action

# service oddjobd nonexist ; echo $?
Usage: /etc/init.d/oddjobd {start|stop|restart|condrestart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
1

now: 1
expected: 2

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-02-02 11:28:09 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-03-10 07:51:08 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0339.html