Bug 674883

Summary: ACL: setfacl -x does not fail when asked to remove a non-existent Access Control Entry
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ivana Varekova <varekova>
Component: aclAssignee: Kamil Dudka <kdudka>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0CC: agruen, harshula, mvadkert, ovasik, pkovar, pschiffe, sct, syeghiay, varekova
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ManPageChange
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Prior to this update, the setfacl.1 man page was not intelligible in that it did not state that removing a non-existent ACL entry is not considered to be an error. With this update, the setfacl.1 man page has been updated so that its content is now intelligible and exactly specifies the aforementioned behavior with regard to removing a non-existent ACL entry.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 658734 Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-06 13:24:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 658734    
Bug Blocks: 719902    

Comment 4 Petr Kovar 2011-06-28 10:49:04 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Prior to this update, the setfacl.1 man page was not intelligible in that it did not state that removing a non-existent ACL entry is not considered to be an error. With this update, the setfacl.1 man page has been updated so that its content is now intelligible and exactly specifies the aforementioned behavior with regard to removing a non-existent ACL entry.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-06 13:24:29 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0924.html