Bug 675520

Summary: [abrt] nautilus-2.91.9-1.fc15: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Alexander Ivanov <hrafn>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: ccecchi, clydekunkel7734, mcepl, mcepl, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:171e895e202a2b1ad27c2d319bd0649053635644
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-06-04 00:10:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Alexander Ivanov 2011-02-06 09:08:02 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.14
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
kernel: 2.6.38-0.rc3.git4.1.fc15.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.91.9-1.fc15
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 15 (Rawhide)
time: 1296983217
uid: 0

How to reproduce
-----
1. close Nautilus window
2.
3.
Comment 1 Alexander Ivanov 2011-02-06 09:08:05 UTC 
Created attachment 477275 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:10:55 UTC 
This has already been fixed some time ago before 3.0, see [1].

[1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/libnautilus-private/nautilus-module.c?id=a0569367b029140ca15cdd5d0d78a3577c3d6d83
Comment 3 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:11:20 UTC 
*** Bug 674748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:13:13 UTC 
*** Bug 675018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:16:51 UTC 
*** Bug 679312 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:35:38 UTC 
*** Bug 679573 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***