| Summary: | pkgconfig files have wrong version information | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Steven Dake <sdake> | ||||
| Component: | corosync | Assignee: | Steven Dake <sdake> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | urgent | ||||||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | cluster-maint, djansa, jkortus, syeghiay | ||||
| Target Milestone: | beta | Keywords: | Regression | ||||
| Target Release: | 6.1 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | corosync-1.2.3-25.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 14:24:21 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Steven Dake
2011-02-07 15:36:34 UTC
The original analysis on this bugzilla was wrong, instead its the pkgconfig (.pc) files which are incorrect. This still causes serious problems. An example pc file from the build is:
[root@cast x86_64]# more /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/coro*
prefix=/usr
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=/usr/lib64
includedir=${prefix}/include
lcrsodir=/usr/libexec/lcrso
socketdir=/var/run
Name: corosync
Version: UNKNOWN
Description: corosync
Requires:
Cflags: -I${includedir}
The version field should be 1.2.3.
Created attachment 477442 [details]
patch to spec file to resolve regression
$ more /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/corosync.pc
prefix=/usr
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=/usr/lib64
includedir=${prefix}/include
lcrsodir=/usr/libexec/lcrso
socketdir=/var/run
Name: corosync
Version: 1.2.3
Description: corosync
Requires:
Cflags: -I${includedir}
rpm -q corosync
corosync-1.2.3-26.el6.x86_64
marking as verified.
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0764.html |