Bug 676706

Summary: dumpconf: Add DELAY_MINUTES description to man page
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Joseph Kachuck <jkachuck>
Component: s390utilsAssignee: Dan HorĂ¡k <dhorak>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.1CC: azelinka, ovasik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: s390utils-1.8.2-31.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 13:32:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
s390-tools-rhel6-dumpconf-prevent-loop-man.patch none

Description Joseph Kachuck 2011-02-10 21:02:42 UTC
Created attachment 478118 [details]
s390-tools-rhel6-dumpconf-prevent-loop-man.patch

s390-tools-rhel6-dumpconf-prevent-loop-man.patch

Description: dumpconf: Add DELAY_MINUTES description to man page
Symptom: User has no online documentation for the DELAY_MINUTES keyword.
Problem: Description of the DELAY_MINUTES keyword is missing in dumpconf
man page.
Solution: Add description of DELAY_MINUTES keyword to dumpconf man page.
Also add some minor man page cleanups from upstream version.

The patch has been tested, fixes the problem, and will be included in the next
upstream release of the s390-tools.

With best regards,
Hendrik

Comment 3 IBM Bug Proxy 2011-04-01 06:41:20 UTC
------- Comment From mgrf@de.ibm.com 2011-04-01 02:38 EDT-------
This is verified included in R 6.1 - closing on IBM site

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:32:43 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0601.html