| Summary: | biosdevname can have false positives with PCI domains | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Component: | biosdevname | Assignee: | Harald Hoyer <harald> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | atodorov, borgan, bzeranski, jfeeney, jstodola, martinez, matt_domsch, pknirsch, prarit, rvokal, shiyer, trinh.dao |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 6.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 13:49:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 501533, 580566, 669562 | ||
|
Description
Bill Nottingham
2011-02-11 21:35:26 UTC
The following systems in beaker have multiple PCI domains. dell-pet710-01.lab.bos.redhat.com dell-pet710-02.lab.bos.redhat.com dell-pem905-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com dell-per905-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com dell-pem805-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com dell-per805-01.rhts.eng.bos.redhat.com Actually.. I had like to clarify.. Although the Dell systems that I mentioned here(and they are the only ones) have multiple PCI domains they would all have SMBIOS version 2.6 so you will not default to the PIRQ fallback code for these sytems as they would have the SMBIOS provided names. I am not sure if there are other OEMs that have a situation where they support a system with multiple PCI domains and don't provide SMBIOS names. This fix will help such other OEM systems. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0644.html |