Bug 677084

Summary: Error unpacking rpm package iputils-20101006-7.fc15.x86_64
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Magnus Tuominen <magnus.tuominen>
Component: iputilsAssignee: Jiri Skala <jskala>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: aglotov, jskala
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-02-14 15:47:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Magnus Tuominen 2011-02-13 08:29:19 UTC 
Description of problem:
I am trying to build a package using mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free and it fails every time with this error:

Error unpacking rpm package iputils-20101006-7.fc15.x86_64
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /bin/ping: cpio: cap_set_file failed - Operation not supported
1115 blocks

Failed:
  iputils.x86_64 0:20101006-7.fc15

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
iputils.x86_64 0:20101006-7.fc15

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start a mockbuild for rawhide
2. Wait for yum to get the files
3. Fail when installing
  
Actual results:
Mock fails to install all needed packages and build.

Expected results:
Mock tries to build package.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jiri Skala 2011-02-14 13:31:58 UTC 
Hi,
I've tested it and everything works fine BUT:

I suppose you ran into problems due to mass rebuild + f15 branches creation. You should also verify your mock configs. Let me know about your's findings.

Jiri
Comment 2 Magnus Tuominen 2011-02-14 15:41:32 UTC 
Seems to be fixed now after disabling tmpfs_* in my /etc/mock/site-defaults.
Comment 3 Jiri Skala 2011-02-14 15:47:48 UTC 
ok, thanks for feedback - closing 'not a bug'