| Summary: | rpm -q --provides not displaying rpmlib() entries | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Guil Barros <gbarros> | |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> | |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | jbastian | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | All | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 677781 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-02-16 06:48:58 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 677781 | |||
This is exactly as it's supposed to be: rpmlib() dependencies can not be satisfied by provides in packages, only the /running/ rpm instance can satisfy them by their very nature.
Say you have a package depending on a new rpm feature, tracked by an rpmlib() dependency, which the currently installed rpm doesn't have:
# rpm -Uvh foo-1.2.i686.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(NewFeature) ... is needed by foo-1.2.i686
Unlike regular dependencies, this can't be fixed by adding an updated rpm package into the transaction (eg "rpm -Uvh foo-1.2.i686.rpm rpm-*4.123*.rpm"), because a newer rpm version which brings the support for "NewFeature" must be used to execute the transaction. So you need to first update rpm itself to a version which provides the needed rpmlib() feature, and only then you can install a package using that feature.
So it requires a two-step update?
# rpm -Uvh foo-1.2.i686.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
rpmlib(NewFeature) ... is needed by foo-1.2.i686
# rpm -Uvh rpm-2.2.i686.rpm
# rpm -Uvh foo-1.2.i686.rpm
The main concern really is that rpmlib() dependencies look like regular dependencies to the end user but do not show up as regular dependencies, leading to confusion. Maybe we could change the way its presented?
|
Description of problem: rpm -q --provides not displaying rpmlib() entries Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rpm-4.8.0-12.el6 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -q --provides rpm Actual results: # rpm -q --provides rpm config(rpm) = 4.8.0-12.el6 rpm = 4.8.0-12.el6 rpm(x86-64) = 4.8.0-12.el6 Expected results: # rpm -q --provides rpm config(rpm) = 4.8.0-12.el6 rpm = 4.8.0-12.el6 rpm(x86-64) = 4.8.0-12.el6 rpmlib(BuiltinLuaScripts) = 4.2.2-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(ConcurrentAccess) = 4.1-1 rpmlib(ExplicitPackageProvide) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(FileCaps) = 4.6.1-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(HeaderLoadSortsTags) = 4.0.1-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) = 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsBzip2) = 3.0.5-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) = 4.4.2-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 rpmlib(ScriptletInterpreterArgs) = 4.0.3-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 Additional info: The info can be seen with: # rpm --showrc rpm | grep rpmlib Features supported by rpmlib: rpmlib(BuiltinLuaScripts) = 4.2.2-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(ConcurrentAccess) = 4.1-1 rpmlib(ExplicitPackageProvide) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(FileCaps) = 4.6.1-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(HeaderLoadSortsTags) = 4.0.1-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) = 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsBzip2) = 3.0.5-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) = 4.4.2-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) = 5.2-1 rpmlib(ScriptletInterpreterArgs) = 4.0.3-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1