| Summary: | /dev/tgt does not have SELinux label | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Milos Malik <mmalik> | |
| Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | medium | |||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | dwalsh, ksrot, mgrepl | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | All | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 677989 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 11:57:41 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 677989 | |||
|
Description
Milos Malik
2011-02-16 12:35:48 UTC
What should it be labeled? fixed_disk_device_t? or /dev/sg[0-9]+ -c system_u:object_r:scsi_generic_device_t:s0 /dev/bsg/.+ -c system_u:object_r:scsi_generic_device_t:s0 I believe we should label it as scsi_generic_device_t. sounds good to me Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-71.el6 (In reply to comment #2) > What should it be labeled? fixed_disk_device_t? > or > /dev/sg[0-9]+ -c system_u:object_r:scsi_generic_device_t:s0 > /dev/bsg/.+ -c system_u:object_r:scsi_generic_device_t:s0 I don't know. Just clearing the NEEDINFO flag. This is labelled by scsi_generic_device_t label now. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0526.html |