Bug 678366

Summary:	fence management not fully functional
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Component:	luci	Assignee:	Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1	CC:	cluster-maint
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Regression
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	luci-0.23.0-4.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 13:56:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Brian Brock 2011-02-17 17:20:15 UTC

Fence management in luci is broken.  Existing fence methods cannot be removed from a device, and new fence instances cannot be created

luci-0.23.0-3.el6
ricci-0.16.2-28.el6

reliably reproduced with no workarounds yet in test environment

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a basic cluster
2. add a fence device to the cluster (tested with fence_scsi and fence_sanbox2)
3. add a fence method of that type to a node
4. new method is unmanageable in interface

- the new method cannot be removed
- the new method cannot have fence instances added to it
  

Expected to be able to configure a fence instance for a node, and manipulate the fencing configuration in the luci interface

Initially seen with google chrome, will follow-up with test results from other browsers.

Comment 3 Brian Brock 2011-02-17 19:06:36 UTC

firefox also seems to show the bug

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:56:50 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0655.html