Bug 678407
Summary: | [RHEL 5] ipcs and ipcrm in wrong man section | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | John Ruemker <jruemker> |
Component: | util-linux | Assignee: | Karel Zak <kzak> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.6 | CC: | azelinka, jmarko, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-02-21 03:20:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
John Ruemker
2011-02-17 20:38:43 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. (In reply to comment #0) > The ipcs utility accepts the following options: > [...] > > If -q, -m, or -s are specified, only information about those facilities > shall be written. If none of these three are specified, information about all > three shall be written subject to the following options: This text is from POSIX ipcs(1p) from man-pages package, not from ipcs(8) from util-linux package. Try "man 8 ipcs" and "man 1p ipcs". The util-linux man page does not contain any information about the -b option. Anyway, util-linux upstream solution is to move the ipcs and ipcrm man pages from section 8 to the section 1. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0307.html |