Bug 679598

Summary:	RFE: Usability
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	David Le Sage <dlesage>
Component:	control-center	Assignee:	Control Center Maintainer <control-center-maint>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	15	CC:	bnocera, control-center-maint, rstrode
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-02-25 18:44:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description David Le Sage 2011-02-22 22:59:30 UTC

Description of problem:
The control center in Fed 15/GNOME 3 is non-spatial.  If I open the main control panel and click on the "Change Wallpaper" icon, a new dialogue replaces the main control panel, instead of spawning a new window.  Given that this is the case, could we add "Forward" and "Backward" web browser-style navigation buttons for moving back and forth between the main panel and the options.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 15 TC2 Alpha Live CD

How reproducible:
Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Log into the GNOME Shell.
2. Click on your account name (top right hand corner.)
3. Choose the Control Panel.
4. From the control panel, choose to change the desktop wallpaper.
  
Actual results:
Wallpaper dialogue box replaces the main control panel.  There is a "Show All Options" button to take you back to the main control panel screen but it would be more consistent with other software, such as Nautilus and various web browsers, to have back and forward arrow navigation.

Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Bastien Nocera 2011-02-25 18:44:56 UTC

Filed upstream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643322

I was pretty sure there was already a bug opened, but I guess not.