Bug 679866

Summary: Add the ability to configure the "self_fence" attribute for the LVM resource
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Component: congaAssignee: Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.7CC: bbrock, cluster-maint, pkovar
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: conga-0.12.2-27.el5 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Support for setting the "self_fence" attribute for Highly Available Logical Volume Management (HA LVM) resources has been added with this update.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 11:00:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
fix none

Description Ryan McCabe 2011-02-23 18:01:47 UTC
Luci on RHEL5 lacks the ability to set/unset the "self_fence" resource for LVM resources. We have this on RHEL6 with the label "Fence the node if it is unable to clean up LVM tags"

Comment 1 Ryan McCabe 2011-03-25 19:58:39 UTC
Created attachment 487667 [details]
fix

Comment 4 Petr Kovar 2011-06-15 15:18:56 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
Support for setting the "self_fence" attribute for Highly Available Logical Volume Management (HA LVM) resources has been added with this update.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 11:00:03 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1039.html