Bug 679883 (F15deps)

Summary: Fedora 15 repoclosure dependency problems
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: James Laska <jlaska>
Component: distributionAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 15CC: awilliam, dcantrell, jturner, kalevlember, robatino, robert, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Tracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-04 22:05:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 677800, 679896    
Bug Blocks:    

Description James Laska 2011-02-23 19:06:11 UTC
This is a tracker bug for all F-15 package dependency problems.

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2011-04-15 18:05:39 UTC
Marking this tracker as AcceptedBlocker to clear our lists: any bug which meets the description is a release blocker by definition. "# There must be no file conflicts (cases where the files in some packages conflict but the packages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (CD/DVD) install "



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2011-05-10 15:27:50 UTC
adjusting to not block the release, per discussion in 677800.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 3 Kalev Lember 2011-05-13 13:07:05 UTC
Are fixes for these dependency problems suitable for NTH?

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2011-05-13 16:48:25 UTC
not really, no. if they're on the media they're blockers, because we don't accept dependency issues or conflicts on the media by policy. if they're not on the media, there's no point making them NTH, because it only really makes sense to break freeze for things that are on the media; for things that aren't on the media, a 0-day update is effectively identical to having the package in the 'frozen' repos.



-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2012-01-04 22:05:01 UTC
All dependent bugs closed.