Bug 680124
Summary: | s390x /proc/cpuinfo returns wrong number of processors on RHEL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Martin Minar <mminar> | |
Component: | rhn-client-tools | Assignee: | Miroslav Suchý <msuchy> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Martin Minar <mminar> | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | low | |||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | mkoci | |
Target Milestone: | rc | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | rhn-client-tools-1.0.0-56.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 691743 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-05-19 13:06:16 UTC | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 691743 |
Description
Martin Minar
2011-02-24 12:46:21 UTC
After discussion with dhorak short clarification. There is cpuplugd daemon that automaticaly adds/removes cpus based on load and /proc/cpuinfo shows number of cpus defined in that moment. Regarding the fact that this bug is not an issue in RHEL5 - maybe this daemon is not activated by default or it depends on kernel. Strategy of using /sys/devices/cpu for getting total number of cpus should be the valid on. Fixed in spacewalk.git in commits: 823888291bdc6f9cd4d843d18bd7ea88241fac89 3ecd060daf6b53baf63122c80c1d52fdbcba6c38 Cherry picked to satellite.git as commits: ba1b95e5540c39b2aeacfdb4f0a42e6de97e1453 dd8f84ad7fb07be944f5796abaf134806d3d4413 Verified in rhn-client-tools-1.0.0-56.el6 - Hardware tab now shows correct number. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0565.html |