Bug 680150

Summary: RHDS Documentation: Example in section 2.1.1.3 is wrong
Product: Red Hat Directory Server Reporter: Diego Woitasen <diego>
Component: Doc-administration-guideAssignee: Andrew Ross <anross>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.2CC: dlackey, mdoyle, nkinder, rmeggins
Target Milestone: DSDocsKeywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-05 22:38:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 434914, 639035    

Description Diego Woitasen 2011-02-24 13:52:14 UTC 
Description of problem:
The example about how to create a database for a sub suffix is wrong. The '\' in the cn breaks database creation.

There are no syntax error from DS but the database is not created correctly.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHDS 8.2 Documentation

Correct example:
dn: cn=ou=groups\,dc=example\,dc=com,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
objectclass: top
objectclass: extensibleObject
objectclass: nsMappingTree
nsslapd-state: backend
nsslapd-backend: GroupData
nsslapd-parent-suffix: dc=example,dc=com
cn: ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com                  <--- The example has backslashes here.
Comment 1 Deon Ballard 2011-02-25 17:58:27 UTC 
This example should be fixed now:

http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/8.2/html/Administration_Guide/Configuring_Directory_Databases.html#Creating_Suffixes-Creating_Root_and_Sub_Suffixes_from_the_Command_Line

Thanks for the correction!
Comment 2 Diego Woitasen 2011-02-25 18:19:37 UTC 
Yes, it's fine now.

Thanks!
Comment 3 Deon Ballard 2011-03-04 19:13:15 UTC 
These bugs were all fixed in the 8.2 cycle and just need to be verified and closed.
Comment 4 Nathan Kinder 2011-03-15 16:40:20 UTC 
The doc changes look good.  This can be closed.