Bug 68034

Summary:	Package installation progress bar not being updated.
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Public Beta	Reporter:	Sam Varshavchik <mrsam>
Component:	anaconda	Assignee:	Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	limbo	CC:	jos
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-07-18 05:55:48 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	67217

Description Sam Varshavchik 2002-07-05 16:58:34 UTC

In the TUI installer, the upper package installation progress bar isn't being
updated (it stays at 0%, then jumps briefly to 100% after the package is installed).

The lower distribution installation progress bar is being correctly updated.

Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2002-07-08 05:40:25 UTC

*** Bug 68092 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2002-07-10 00:19:53 UTC

Known RPM issue

Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2002-07-18 05:55:44 UTC

Fixed in CVS

Comment 4 Mike McLean 2002-07-18 21:10:51 UTC

Confirmed.

Comment 5 Thomas M Steenholdt 2002-07-31 05:54:34 UTC

Confirmed with RH Limbo 7.3.93

Comment 6 Sam Varshavchik 2002-07-31 06:09:14 UTC

Well, one benefit of having a slow laptop is that you get to see this whole
thing up close and person.

Yes, it's better in Limbo, but it's still not 100% fixed.  Some packages are
still wacky.  For glibc-common, for example, the progress bar creeps to about
25%, then jumps to 100%.

Comment 7 Jeremy Katz 2002-07-31 06:18:25 UTC

That's the expected behavior -- we're going off of package size which doesn't
take into account translations which don't get installed due to language
selection and also (IIRC) is double-counting hardlinks in some situations

Comment 8 Michael Fulbright 2002-12-20 17:38:25 UTC

Time tracking values updated