Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||X server restart when rotating screen|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Jaroslaw Gorny <jaroslaw.gorny>|
|Component:||xorg-x11-drv-intel||Assignee:||Adam Jackson <ajax>|
|Status:||CLOSED DUPLICATE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2011-03-17 10:36:28 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Jaroslaw Gorny 2011-02-25 17:22:31 EST
Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Software from: gfx_test_week_20110221_x86-64.iso How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. open Firefox, go to some site serving HTML5 video 2. start gnome-display-properties 3. try to rotate (in any direction) Actual results: X Server restarts and user is presented the gdm login prompt. Expected results: Screen got rotated properly. Additional info: 1. When there's no video displayed, but some "other" applications, rotation works. 2. Smolt profile of the system: http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_55f01737-29ac-4707-9ea9-b53af748da2b
Comment 1 Matěj Cepl 2011-02-28 14:50:19 EST
Thanks for the bug report. We have reviewed the information you have provided above, and there is some additional information we require that will be helpful in our diagnosis of this issue. Please add drm.debug=0x04 to the kernel command line, restart computer, and attach * your X server config file (/etc/X11/xorg.conf, if available), * X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.*.log) * output of the dmesg command, and * system log (/var/log/messages) to the bug report as individual uncompressed file attachments using the bugzilla file attachment link above. We will review this issue again once you've had a chance to attach this information. Thanks in advance.
Comment 2 Jaroslaw Gorny 2011-03-02 06:48:19 EST
I tried it today on a freshly started system, without external monitor (only LVDS1). And I was not able to reproduce this any more. So I believe the reason why this test failed before was because of second display. That's why I suggest closing this bug as duplicate of #680569.