Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||[abrt] gnumeric-1:1.10.13-1.fc13: Process /usr/bin/gnumeric-1.10.13 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Karl <kaiserkarl31>|
|Component:||gnumeric||Assignee:||Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas>|
|Status:||CLOSED UPSTREAM||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||13||CC:||belegdol, huzaifas, terra|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2011-02-28 02:00:51 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Karl 2011-02-25 17:58:59 EST
abrt version: 1.1.14 architecture: x86_64 Attached file: backtrace cmdline: gnumeric /home/karlh/Desktop/gnumeric-bugtest.gnumeric comment: The crash occurs because the constraint isn't preserved on the save and reload; instead of $A$1 >= 0 it says $A$1 >= #REF#. The solver doesn't check for the improper constraint on file open either. component: gnumeric crash_function: gnm_solver_constraint_get_part executable: /usr/bin/gnumeric-1.10.13 kernel: 22.214.171.124-66.fc13.x86_64 package: gnumeric-1:1.10.13-1.fc13 rating: 4 reason: Process /usr/bin/gnumeric-1.10.13 was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) release: Fedora release 13 (Goddard) time: 1298674152 uid: 500 How to reproduce ----- Easily reproduced: 1. Open new file and enter random numbers in A1:A5 2. Set cell B1 to "=(A1-5)^2" and fill down to B5 3. Set cell B7 to "=SUM(B1:B5)" 4. Open Solver; tell it to set $B$7 -> Min by changing $A$1. 5. Add a constraint: $A$1 >= 0; click "Add" 6. Save the file and close it. 7. Open the file you just saved. 8. Open Solver and click "Solve".
Comment 2 Julian Sikorski 2011-02-26 00:04:03 EST
It happens here. CCing upstream.
Comment 3 M Welinder 2011-02-26 08:28:07 EST
Crash fixed here: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnumeric/commit/?id=022c38d8aaa8cc093554f1e04c5c74766aa876f1 Saving is fine, but loading mangles the right-hand side. I'll have a look at that too.
Comment 4 M Welinder 2011-02-26 08:58:29 EST
Reading and a further problem fixed here. http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnumeric/commit/?id=7c2cdb4a0ef43eeabc1618df1d351395fbcd3970 However, results are still bogus, but that's your own fault: the model is not linear. Use the non-linear solver instead.
Comment 5 Julian Sikorski 2011-02-26 13:49:53 EST
Should I patch the Fedora package with these, or would it be enough if the fix shipped with the next gnumeric version?
Comment 6 M Welinder 2011-02-26 17:48:38 EST
They'll ship with the next version in, I guess, a few weeks. That ought to be good enough. The reporter can build with patches if he really needs it before then.
Comment 7 Karl 2011-02-27 20:11:04 EST
Thank you for your prompt fixes---I look forward to the next version.