| Summary: | anaconda stage1 loader does not pass essential "layer2" network option | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Philip Rowlands <phr> |
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.6 | CC: | brueckner |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | s390x | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-22 13:00:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Philip Rowlands
2011-03-02 15:41:11 UTC
Testing in an environment where layer2=0 is used, "ARP=no" is omitted from ifcfg-eth0 when installing from Hard drive. (This doesn't seem as critical to network operation, compared to the layer2=1 scenario above.) Was this fixed in RHBA-2011:0984? * The hard drive installation method and layer2 VSWITCH caused non-functional networking on the IBM System z. Now, anaconda writes out the LAYER2 and PORTNO options into ifcfg files also on non-network install methods. (BZ#649301) As with so many of the bugs linked from RHBA notices, I can't view bug 649301 (not authorised). Yes, it was. Sorry this bug was not picked up as a dupe. While I cannot make the bug visible to you, you can look at the git commit that fixed the issue: 59992e95263dfe13d5284ab44deb9e22f0f98deb Information on getting the source for anaconda via git is at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 649301 *** |