Bug 681660

Summary: Conflict in 32 bit and 64 bit devel packages
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ondrej Moriš <omoris>
Component: libgssglueAssignee: Steve Dickson <steved>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Zbysek MRAZ <zmraz>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 6.1CC: atodorov, ebenes, mhideo, zmraz
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: libgssglue-0.1-10.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-19 14:29:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 682670    
Attachments:
Description Flags
The needed patch none

Description Ondrej Moriš 2011-03-02 20:59:56 UTC 
Description of problem:

TPS jobs are failing on ppcp, s390x and x86_64 since there is a conflict (see below) in /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h between 32 bit and 64 bit devel package: 

9c9 
< #define SIZEOF_LONG 4 
--- 
> #define SIZEOF_LONG 8 
11c11 
< #define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 4 
--- 
> #define SIZEOF_SIZE_T 8 

Why do those files differ? 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

libgssglue-0.1-9.el6
libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6

How reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. tps-rpmtest -e 2010:10841 (on 64 bit archs)
  
Actual results:

Upgrade test FAILED Output from RPM Command: file /usr/include/gssglue/gssapi/gssapi.h conflicts between attempted installs of libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6.x86_64 and libgssglue-devel-0.1-9.el6.i686 

Expected results:

No conflicts.
Comment 1 Ondrej Moriš 2011-03-02 21:09:29 UTC 
See also http://rpmdiff.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com/run.php?selectedid=18&runid=5592&groupid=
Comment 5 Steve Dickson 2011-03-28 13:44:36 UTC 
Created attachment 488149 [details]
The needed patch
Comment 7 Zbysek MRAZ 2011-03-31 08:33:57 UTC 
The problem still persits. The packages are conflicting with the same reason as in comment#0. Could you please take a look?
Comment 9 Eduard Benes 2011-04-06 13:23:52 UTC 
Looks like there is a similar bug which could be closed with this one, correct?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658046
Comment 10 Steve Dickson 2011-04-06 13:29:25 UTC 
*** Bug 658046 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 14:29:18 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0789.html