| Summary: | SRPMS/aspell-sr-0.02-1.2.1.src.rpm installs wrongly named aspell-sl.spec | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Rob <rgagnon24> |
| Component: | aspell-sr | Assignee: | Peter Schiffer <pschiffe> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | i18n Engineering List <eng-i18n-bugs> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.6 | CC: | llim, pkovar, rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Prior to this update, the file name of the spec file in the aspell-sr source package (aspell-sl.spec) was incorrect. With this update, the spec file name has been corrected to aspell-sr.spec.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-10-13 11:36:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Rob
2011-03-03 01:43:06 UTC
This is a problem because: If you install ALL the SRPMS from the DVD, there will be a file that is written over. Of the 1,231 .src.rpm files, you will only have 1,230 .spec files.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
Prior to this update, the file name of the spec file in the aspell-sr source package (aspell-sl.spec) was incorrect. With this update, the spec file name has been corrected to aspell-sr.spec.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1368.html |