| Summary: | [abrt] anjuta-1:2.91.90.0-1.fc15: g_object_unref: Process /usr/bin/anjuta was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lukas Bezdicka <social> | ||||
| Component: | anjuta | Assignee: | Debarshi Ray <debarshir> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 15 | CC: | debarshir, jhs, rpandit | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:63d8cea117b815e952ddd1757fb304d8a370d135 | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-03-07 23:49:35 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Lukas Bezdicka
2011-03-03 20:09:50 UTC
This bug report is missing a stack trace! Created attachment 482272 [details] backtrace Mar 3 21:09:51 EoS-Rawhide abrtd: New bug id: 681995 Mar 3 21:09:51 EoS-Rawhide abrtd: Adding attachments to bug 681995... Mar 3 21:14:27 EoS-Rawhide abrtd: XML-RPC Fault(-504): HTTP response code is 400, not 200 ^^ sorry abrt problem Interesting part:
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f67896fd940 (LWP 27373)):
#0 0x000000389720f63d in g_object_unref (_object=0x1361120) at gobject.c:2728
object = 0x1361120
old_ref = 0
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "g_object_unref"
#1 0x00007f67803fa397 in anjuta_bookmarks_session_save () from /usr/lib64/anjuta/libanjuta-document-manager.so
Will have a look at it later.
Could you please check if this fixes it for you: http://git.gnome.org/browse/anjuta/commit/?id=ebb2a00b7660771dd136a5d8a8e6bd70cf5ace62 If not, please reopen this bug. Thanks! yes, thanks. Seems ok. |