Bug 682124

Summary: sosreport does not capture nslcd.conf file.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Najmuddin Chirammal <nc>
Component: sosAssignee: Keith Robertson <kroberts>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: David Kutálek <dkutalek>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: agk, bmr, chorn, gavin, jmoran, jwest, kroberts, prc, yjog
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 6.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.2-9.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 830599 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 18:10:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 830599    

Description Najmuddin Chirammal 2011-03-04 08:40:52 UTC
Description of problem:

sosreport does not capture the ldap configuration file /etc/nslcd.conf

Version-Release number of selected component 

sos-2.2-2.el6.noarch


How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run sosreport,  List the contents of the generated archive
  
Actual results:

no nslcd.conf file.

Expected results:

sosreport only captures ldap.conf file, since nss-pam-ldapd use nslcd.conf file it should be included in the archive.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 02:16:04 UTC
Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 18:10:31 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1536.html