Bug 682391

Summary: assumes ethernet devices are named ethX
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component: system-config-firewallAssignee: Thomas Woerner <twoerner>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Tomas Dolezal <todoleza>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: ovasik, psklenar, rvokal, todoleza, twoerner
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: system-config-firewall-1.2.27-7.1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 682390 Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-07 08:06:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 682390    
Bug Blocks: 682269, 947782    

Description Bill Nottingham 2011-03-05 03:06:35 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #682390 +++

Description of problem:

Network devices can have arbitrary names, and due to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ConsistentNetworkDeviceNaming, will have
different names in Fedora 15.

system-config-firewall-1.2.29/src/fw_config.py.in:STD_DEVICES = [ "eth", "ppp", "isdn", "ippp", "tun", "wlan" ]

It does get (at least in the GUI) devices from NM, so it may not be a huge deal. But filing for completeness.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

system-config-firewall-1.2.29

How reproducible:

By code inspection.
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-03-05 03:38:45 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.
Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2011-07-06 01:31:29 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.
Comment 6 RHEL Program Management 2012-09-07 05:08:04 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2014-07-07 08:06:28 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0837.html