Bug 682486
Summary: | Review Request: drupal6-video - Allows Creation of CCK Video Fields | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | eric |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Tim Lauridsen <tim.lauridsen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | tim.lauridsen:
fedora-review+
j: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-03-14 05:37:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 682489 |
Description
eric
2011-03-06 01:21:26 UTC
I will review this bug Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated [x] : MUST - Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] : MUST - Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [-] : MUST - %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [-] : MUST - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] : MUST - Package contains no bundled libraries. [x] : MUST - Changelog in prescribed format. [x] : MUST - Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-] : MUST - %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x] : MUST - Each %files section contains %defattr [-] : MUST - Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-] : MUST - Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install file if it is a GUI application. [x] : MUST - Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] : MUST - Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] : MUST - Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] : MUST - Permissions on files are set properly. [x] : MUST - Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [-] : MUST - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] : MUST - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] : MUST - Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [-] : MUST - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [-] : MUST - Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] : MUST - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x] : MUST - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] : MUST - License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [-] : MUST - License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-] : MUST - The spec file handles locales properly. [x] : MUST - Package consistently uses macros. instead of hard-coded directory names. [-] : MUST - Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x] : MUST - Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] : MUST - Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [-] : MUST - No %config files under /usr. [x] : MUST - Package does not genrate any conflict. [x] : MUST - Package does not contains kernel modules. [x] : MUST - Package contains no static executables. [x] : MUST - Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x] : MUST - Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] : MUST - Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] : MUST - Package installs properly. [-] : MUST - Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x] : MUST - Package is not relocatable. [x] : MUST - Requires correct, justified where necessary. [!] : MUST - Rpmlint output is silent. rpmlint drupal66-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm ================================================================================ drupal66-video.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcode -> trans code, trans-code, transcend drupal66-video.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans coder, trans-coder, transcendent drupal66-video.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailing -> thumb nailing, thumb-nailing, thumbnail 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ================================================================================ rpmlint drupal66-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-1.fc16.src.rpm ================================================================================ drupal66-video.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcode -> trans code, trans-code, transcend drupal66-video.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans coder, trans-coder, transcendent drupal66-video.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailing -> thumb nailing, thumb-nailing, thumbnail drupal66-video.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://drupal.org/project/video <urlopen error timed out> drupal66-video.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. ================================================================================ There is some problems with the macros in the name, so the names become drupal66-video, instead of drupal6-video this must be fixed. [-] : MUST - Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] : MUST - Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. MD5SUM this package : c54574934aa75fccb21b044a8e8b54b0 MD5SUM upstream package : c54574934aa75fccb21b044a8e8b54b0 [x] : MUST - Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] : MUST - Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-] : MUST - Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. [x] : MUST - Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x] : MUST - File names are valid UTF-8. [-] : MUST - Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x] : SHOULD - Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-] : SHOULD - If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x] : SHOULD - Dist tag is present. [x] : SHOULD - No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x] : SHOULD - Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [?] : SHOULD - Package functions as described. [x] : SHOULD - Latest version is packaged. [x] : SHOULD - Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] : SHOULD - Man pages included for all executables. [-] : SHOULD - Uses parallel make. [-] : SHOULD - Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-] : SHOULD - The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x] : SHOULD - Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [!] : SHOULD - SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Source0: http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/video-6.x-4.2-beta2.tar.gz (video-6.x-4.2-beta2.tar.gz) [x] : SHOULD - SourceX is a working URL. [!] : SHOULD - Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?] : SHOULD - Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-] : SHOULD - %check is present and all tests pass. [x] : SHOULD - Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x] : SHOULD - Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: [!] : MUST - Rpmlint output is silent. rpmlint drupal66-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm ================================================================================ drupal66-video.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcode -> trans code, trans-code, transcend drupal66-video.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans coder, trans-coder, transcendent drupal66-video.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailing -> thumb nailing, thumb-nailing, thumbnail 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ================================================================================ rpmlint drupal66-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-1.fc16.src.rpm ================================================================================ drupal66-video.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcode -> trans code, trans-code, transcend drupal66-video.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US transcoder -> trans coder, trans-coder, transcendent drupal66-video.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thumbnailing -> thumb nailing, thumb-nailing, thumbnail drupal66-video.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://drupal.org/project/video <urlopen error timed out> drupal66-video.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. ================================================================================ There is some problems with the macros in the name, so the names become drupal66-video, instead of drupal6-video this must be fixed. [!] : SHOULD - SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Source0: http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/video-6.x-4.2-beta2.tar.gz (video-6.x-4.2-beta2.tar.gz) should be http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/%{modname}-%{version}.tar.gz Hmmm... Okay, I know *why* the 66 problem is coming from. I don't know exactly how to fix it when building in F14... I'll make some changes this morning and see if I can remedy this. SPEC: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/drupal6-video.spec SRPM: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc14.src.rpm Hard coded the name so there wouldn't be a problem between version of Fedora. RPMLINT shows no errors. APPROVED New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: drupal6-video Short Description: Allows creation of CCK video fields in Drupal. Owners: sparks Branches: f15 f14 f13 el5 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc15 drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el5 drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc14 drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el6 drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc13 drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. drupal6-video-6.x.4.2.beta2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. |