Bug 682850

Summary:	IPA provider should use realm instead of ipa_domain for base DN
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Component:	sssd	Assignee:	Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1	CC:	benl, dpal, grajaiya, jgalipea, nsoman, prc
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	sssd-1.5.1-12.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	682853 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 11:38:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	682853

Description Rob Crittenden 2011-03-07 19:12:43 UTC

Description of problem:

From https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/807

See https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/1001 and the bug linked from there.

The problem is that IPA seems to be deriving its Base DN from the Kerberos realm. SSSD derives it from IPA domain. In 99% of cases the two are the same, but there's no requirement on it, so we should use the realm, too.

Comment 2 Namita Soman 2011-04-07 18:16:36 UTC

Verified using:
sssd-1.5.5-0.20110405T0615z.el6.x86_64

installed ipa server as -
ipa-server-install --setup-dns --forwarder=10.14.63.12 -p Secret123 -P Secret123 -a Secret123 -r QWQW

and verified sssd.conf, and default.conf have the right entries:
sssd.conf:
section for [domain/testrelm] includes:
krb5_realm = QWQW
ipa_domain = testrelm

section for [domain/default] includes:
krb5_realm = QWQW

default.conf includes:
basedn=dc=qwqw
realm=QWQW
domain=testrelm
xmlrpc_uri=https://rhel61-server5.testrelm/ipa/xml
ldap_uri=ldapi://%2fvar%2frun%2fslapd-QWQW.socket

also verified kinit 
# kinit admin
Password for admin@QWQW:

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 11:38:58 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0560.html

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 13:09:49 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0560.html