Bug 683487

Summary:	Review Request: R-ACCLMA - R contrib package for ACC & LMA Graph Plotting
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Madhavprasad Pai <mkpai>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, jamatos, notting, pingou
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	noarch
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-11-08 14:01:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Madhavprasad Pai 2011-03-09 14:48:54 UTC

Spec URL: http://pai.fedorapeople.org/R-ACCLMA.spec
SRPM URL: http://pai.fedorapeople.org/R-ACCLMA-1.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description: 

This is a contrib package to the R software environment for statistical computing and graphics. 

The R package summary is

[snip]
The main function is plotLMA(sourcefile,header) that takes a data set and plots the appropriate LMA and ACC graphs. If no sourcefile (a string) was passed, a manual data entry window is opened. The header parameter indicates by TRUE/FALSE (false by default) if the source CSV file has a head row or not. The data set should contain only one independent variable (X) and one dependent varialbe (Y) and can contain a weight for each observation
[/snip]

Comment 1 Madhavprasad Pai 2011-03-09 14:51:50 UTC

Need sponsor

Comment 2 José Matos 2011-03-12 00:19:53 UTC

I am a sponsor and I am willing to sponsor you.

Have you read the steps described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join ?

In order to access your understanding of the packaging rules you can review without approving other packages (until you are sponsored then, of course, you free and encouraged to review other packages) as can be seen in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

Regards

Comment 3 Madhavprasad Pai 2011-03-16 11:53:11 UTC

Hello Jose',

Thank you for reviewing my request.

I have read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join

I shall take up your suggestion and read other review requests at
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html so that I can help others.

Thanks again and regards,
-- Pai

Comment 4 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-04-19 13:26:19 UTC

Hello,

Please refers in this bug to informal review request you did or new package you submitted, this would help to sponsor your.

I am also sponsor and also willing to help you become a packager

Comment 5 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-07-27 06:08:39 UTC

ping ?

Comment 6 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-09-06 13:53:29 UTC

ping ?

Without answer in a week, I will close this review.

Comment 7 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-11-08 14:01:50 UTC

Ok closing