Bug 683638
| Summary: | Review Request: pyes- Python library for connecting to and managing Elasticsearch | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tavis Aitken <tavisto> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mail, mrunge, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | Stalled Submitter | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-05-08 07:22:46 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Tavis Aitken
2011-03-09 22:05:27 UTC
SRPM URL: should be http://rpms.tavisto.net/fedora-rpms/pyes-0.14.1-1.fc14.src.rpm Just some quick comments... - Why not place all doc files on one line? - The website says "This version requires elasticsearch 0.12 or above.". elasticsearch is not available in the Fedora Package Collection. This will make it hard for reviewer to test the package. Fabian, Thanks for the review. > - Why not place all doc files on one line? - The docs are all separate so they can be easily reviewed or removed if the source changes. I can change it if that is the recommended way to do things. e website says "This version requires elasticsearch 0.12 or above.". > elasticsearch is not available in the Fedora Package Collection. This will make > it hard for reviewer to test the package. - This is a client library for Elasticsearch, which is not packaged in Fedora as of yet because it requires some newer versions of Lucene ( 3.0.0 tree ) and other java projects that are not packaged. I have built a package that can be used but do not meet the Fedora packaging requirements as of now. I have plans to try and make it Fedora compatible but have not managed it as of yet. https://github.com/tavisto/elasticsearch-rpms/blob/master/SPECS/elasticsearch.spec Fabian, Thanks for the review. > - Why not place all doc files on one line? - The docs are all separate so they can be easily reviewed or removed if the source changes. I can change it if that is the recommended way to do things. e website says "This version requires elasticsearch 0.12 or above.". > elasticsearch is not available in the Fedora Package Collection. This will make > it hard for reviewer to test the package. - This is a client library for Elasticsearch, which is not packaged in Fedora as of yet because it requires some newer versions of Lucene ( 3.0.0 tree ) and other java projects that are not packaged. I have built a package that can be used but do not meet the Fedora packaging requirements as of now. I have plans to try and make it Fedora compatible but have not managed it as of yet. https://github.com/tavisto/elasticsearch-rpms/blob/master/SPECS/elasticsearch.spec Tavis, are you still interested? If yes, you should refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group especial the section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Convincing_someone_to_sponsor_you You should do some informal reviews to convince a sponsor of your packaging qualities. You should note the bugzilla bug numbers here (as a reference for your sponsor) Thanks Any progress here? closing this. Tavis, if you're still interested, please open a new review request. |