Bug 684243

Summary: [abrt] nautilus-2.91.91-1.fc15: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vít Ondruch <vondruch>
Component: nautilusAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 15CC: 1rafools1, ccecchi, jon.dufresne, patsev.anton, saurabh.rawat90, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:56e07f9c920cfd006d639c75ed7a17a7864d9ebc
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-20 14:56:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Vít Ondruch 2011-03-11 15:11:53 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace, 46596 bytes
cmdline: nautilus
component: nautilus
Attached file: coredump, 63913984 bytes
crash_function: nautilus_window_slot_get_current_uri
executable: /usr/bin/nautilus
kernel: 2.6.38-0.rc8.git0.1.fc15.x86_64
package: nautilus-2.91.91-1.fc15
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/nautilus was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
time: 1299856607
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. Nothing special
2.
3.
Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2011-03-11 15:11:56 UTC 
Created attachment 483748 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Jon Dufresne 2011-03-18 02:53:06 UTC 
Package: nautilus-2.91.91-1.fc15
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)


How to reproduce
-----
1. Clicked on GNOME Shell activities to get a desktop overview
2. Clicked the (X) over the file manager window
3. After clicking received the crash dialog
Comment 3 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:31:23 UTC 
*** Bug 684258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:33:55 UTC 
*** Bug 690674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-06-04 00:34:47 UTC 
*** Bug 693558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 abrt-bot 2012-03-20 14:56:55 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #751916, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #690674, bug #693558, bug #697321, bug #699184, bug #751916, bug #755296, bug #756754, bug #757095, bug #757221, bug #757223, bug #757305, bug #757779, bug #758468, bug #759673, bug #759731, bug #759848, bug #759872, bug #760399, bug #761143, bug #761145, bug #765781, bug #766253, bug #766616, bug #766659, bug #767026, bug #767242

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 751916 ***