Bug 684660

Summary: [abrt] gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14: _dbus_abort: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: jorge <soy.el.raze>
Component: gvfsAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: alexl, bnocera, shnurapet, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:498a1a552e379e6f94b5b36331a9f25f4a819653
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-30 14:04:29 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description jorge 2011-03-14 07:13:00 UTC
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 7741 bytes
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp --spawner :1.10 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/6
component: gvfs
Attached file: coredump, 9453568 bytes
crash_function: _dbus_abort
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp
kernel: 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686
package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-sftp was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1300086685
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1. No tengo idea
2. Estoy corriendo firefox, descomprimiendo un archivo en un servidor remoto a través de SSH, algunos PDF y creo que ya
3.

Comment 1 jorge 2011-03-14 07:13:02 UTC
Created attachment 484073 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Misha Shnurapet 2011-04-05 16:41:16 UTC
Package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
Architecture: i686
OS Release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)


How to reproduce
-----
1.
2.
3.
.

Comment 3 abrt-bot 2012-03-30 14:04:29 UTC
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #702268, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #657671, bug #662308, bug #671916, bug #702268

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 702268 ***