Bug 68508
| Summary: | gdb doesn't remove breakpoints from forked child processes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | Jonathan Kamens <jik> | ||||
| Component: | gdb | Assignee: | Elena Zannoni <ezannoni> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Aaron Brown <abrown> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 1.0 | CC: | notting | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-08-10 08:15:33 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jonathan Kamens
2002-07-10 19:22:34 UTC
There is no attachment here... also, make sure to get gdb 5.2 from Rawhide as that's what's current. We don't change gdb, so it wouldn't be a Red Hat bug if it actually is one... Closing for inactivity - reopen with data if needed. Created attachment 68844 [details]
test program
Sorry I forgot to attach the test program before. You should have been able to construct it yourself pretty easily, given my description of the bug :-). I am using gdb-5.2.1-1, and it exhibits this bug. Note that I never got E-mail about the comment you appended to this ticket on July 10. I got E-mail on August 2 about the bug, and the diff in that E-mail showed that *both* your comment from July 10 and the one from August 2 were added. I seem to recall reading that there was some confusion in bugzilla about email notices of bug changes. I hope this confusion has been resolved. I fail to see how it's relevant that "We don't change gdb, so it wouldn't be a Red Hat bug if it actually is one..." I am under the impression that you track bugs in your packages even when you didn't introduce them, and that when a sufficiently complicated bug is introduced into a package you ship, you might actually devote development time to finding a fix. At the very least, I thought you forward bug reports upstream so that people can just report bugs in Red Hat packages to you rather than guessing whether they need to report them to you or the upstream maintainers. 'Red Hat Raw Hide' refers to the development tree for Red Hat Linux. Red Hat Linux is no longer supported by Red Hat, Inc. If you are still running Red Hat Linux, you are strongly advised to upgrade to a current Fedora Core release or Red Hat Enterprise Linux or comparable. Some information on which option may be right for you is available at http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/redhatlinux/. Red Hat apologizes that these issues were not resolved in a more timely manner. However, we do want to make sure that important don't slip through the cracks. If these issues are still present in a current release, such as Fedora Core 5, please move these bugs to that product and version. Note that any remaining Red Hat Raw Hide bugs will be closed as 'CANTFIX' on September 30, 2006. Thanks again for your help. This is no longer an issue in gdb-6.3.0.0-1.131.FC6. I don't know exactly when it was fixed. |