Bug 687866

Summary:	Add yum-langpacks to anaconda environment
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Component:	lorax	Assignee:	Martin Gracik <mgracik>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	15	CC:	anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, bcl, dmach, jlaska, rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	AcceptedNTH
Fixed In Version:	lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-03-23 04:59:04 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	657619

Description Bill Nottingham 2011-03-15 15:42:22 UTC

Description of problem:

By doing this, we:

1) make sure the right thing happens even if the user deselects the langsupport group for his local language
2) make sure the right thing happens if we do not add explicit entries to comps for all langsupport groups, or forget to add a langsupport group

Patch sent to anaconda-devel-list.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Fedora 15

Comment 1 James Laska 2011-03-15 16:00:14 UTC

Bill, this is currently on the Target tracker ... which isn't monitored anymore during blocker reviews.

Does this impact the release criteria in any way?  If so, we can propose this as a release blocker.

 * Blocker - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process

Is this more a nice-to-have issue that can only be fixed as an installer update?  If so, we can mark it as a NICE-TO-HAVE.

 * Nice-to-have - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process

Thoughts/suggestions?

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2011-03-15 16:21:28 UTC

It would be NTH, not blocker.

Comment 3 James Laska 2011-03-15 16:36:39 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> It would be NTH, not blocker.

Thanks, adding this to Beta nice-to-have list (F15Beta-accepted).  My gut tells me anything involving yum langpacks would be good to have included and tested in the beta ... rather than landing for the first time in Final.

Comment 4 Adam Williamson 2011-03-18 18:44:14 UTC

Discussed at 2011-03-18 blocker/NTH review meeting. Given Bill's helpful summary, we definitely agree this is NTH material and it would be good to pull this fix in for Beta. AcceptedNTH.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2011-03-21 14:01:43 UTC

lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2011-03-23 04:58:42 UTC

lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.