Bug 687915

Summary: Review Request: plasmate - IDE for Plasmoid
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hiemanshu Sharma <fedora>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, kevin, notting, packages
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: NotReady
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-22 16:17:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Hiemanshu Sharma 2011-03-15 17:39:27 UTC 
Spec URL: http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/reviews/plasmate.spec
SRPM URL: http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/reviews/plasmate-0.1-2.alpha2.fc15.src.rpm
Description: A complete solution for developing Plasma “widgets”, themes, dataengines, ions and krunners. Lowering the bar for contribution to the KDE community.
Comment 1 Golo Fuchert 2011-03-20 14:31:01 UTC 
Three initial comments:
- I have not worked with KDE widgets, so there might be a thing called "ion", 
  but maybe you meant icon here? Of course I apologize if there is an object
  called ion, wouldn't be too strange when talking about plasma, either. ;-)
- You surely know that it's not the best practice to use patches without any 
  comment why it is necessary and if upstream is aware of it. Also, upstream is
  very often quite happy about the .desktop files.
- You _could_ (but don't have to) use macros in the URL and Source0 tag and in 
  the files section.

Otherwise the package looks very good and clean to me (must have a closer look though).
Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2012-05-09 22:13:49 UTC 
Spec and SRPM URLs are invalid.  Please clear the whiteboard if providing working URLs.
Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-09 07:21:29 UTC 
Are you still interested in this review, or can we close it so somebody else can submit a new review request?
Comment 4 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-14 22:26:36 UTC 
Ping? We waited 5 days now, 2 more and the review can and will be closed by the stalled review policy.

Even if you are not interested anymore, it would still be nice to say so rather than just not replying.
Comment 5 Kevin Kofler 2013-02-22 16:17:03 UTC 
Meanwhile another week has passed, still no answer. The submitter hasn't responded ever since the initial submission in March 2011.

Stalled review, closing.