Bug 688048

Summary: Instance fails to launch
Product: [Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine Reporter: Shveta <ssachdev>
Component: aeolus-conductorAssignee: Mike Orazi <morazi>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: wes hayutin <whayutin>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 0.3.1CC: akarol, cpelland, dajohnso, deltacloud-maint, dgao, ssachdev
Target Milestone: beta   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-03-16 13:55:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
err none

Description Shveta 2011-03-16 07:11:42 UTC 
Created attachment 485660 [details]
err

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Created a template of x86_64(only this is allowed)
2. Built the template.
3. Created a h/w profile of x86_64.
4. Launched an instance , which failed to launch with the following error in logs 

Deltacloud::BackendError - InvalidParameterValue: The requested instance type's architecture (x86_64) does not match the architecture in the manifest for ami-6226d30b (i386)
REQUEST=ec2.us-east-1.amazonaws.com:443/?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAI2KPFDYVZKSRTJMQ&Action=RunInstances&AddressingType=public&ImageId=ami-6226d30b&InstanceType=c1.xlarge&KeyName=ssachdev%40redhat.com_1300254272_key_70253946536020&MaxCount=1&MinCount=1&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2011-03-16T06%3A55%3A30.000Z&Version=2010-08-31&Signature=FPl25zk67NAp4AgDzNAhF3bSlWcCqBGQtaCFczptlis%3D
REQUEST ID=ca5c763d-568d-4546-adb7-a3ef203a469d :
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/44068

there is conflict in architecture .
Comment 1 wes hayutin 2011-03-16 13:55:40 UTC 
closing this bug as a duplicate, reopening the original bug and placing it on_qa to be tested on the latest build.  If there is still an issue found in the latest build we want to retain the history of the issue... so https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669246 will be reopened.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 669246 ***
Comment 2 wes hayutin 2011-12-08 13:56:08 UTC 
perm close