Bug 689381
Summary: | tcsh obeys printexitvalue for back-ticks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Ondrej Vasik <ovasik> |
Component: | tcsh617 | Assignee: | Vojtech Vitek <vvitek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 5.4 | CC: | bnater, hripps, jbastian, jwest, msvoboda, psplicha, rdassen, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch, Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Previously, if the "printexitvalue" variable was set, tcsh returned the exit code number as a part of the command output, rendering the output unusable. This has happened due to a missing job status flag. The proper flag has been set and the command output is now correct.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 531353 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2011-07-21 08:47:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 531353 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 502912, 579251, 590060, 640252 |
Comment 5
Miroslav Svoboda
2011-07-01 22:04:56 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1072.html An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1072.html |