Bug 689627

rpmbuild --rebuild of the srpm fails with:

/usr/bin/python ./test_myproxyclient.py MyProxyClientInterfaceTestCase
..ERROR:myproxy.client:Certificate <X509Name object '/O=NDG/OU=Security/CN=localhost'> in peer certificate chain has expired
F
======================================================================
FAIL: test03SSLVerification (__main__.MyProxyClientInterfaceTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./test_myproxyclient.py", line 325, in test03SSLVerification
    self.assert_(status == successStatus)
AssertionError: False is not true

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 3 tests in 0.002s

FAILED (failures=1)

Hi Steve!

Any progress on this one, or have you dropped it?

    Mattias

I'll close unless you want to take it.

I will take it.

First question, will you push this to EPEL5?

If you are taking it then it's you choice if to do EPEL5 or not?
Steve.

I'd say NOT. But you CERN guys prefer EL a lot, I should listen to the opinion from you at least.

Please package 1.3.1 first.

BTW tell me your FAS name, I need to verify if you've been sponsored or not.

Christopher,

Steve is a long time Fedora packager, the FAS name is stevetraylen.
Everything's fine here.

(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #8)
> Christopher,
> 
> Steve is a long time Fedora packager, the FAS name is stevetraylen.
> Everything's fine here.

Thanks, but I think he should put such info in the initial comment, why not help us?

I still need to await the anwser of targeting EL5 or not, because this will affect the macros will be used.

If Steven think it's inappreciable to answer such questions, please reassign.

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #9)

> Thanks, but I think he should put such info in the initial comment, why not
> help us?

Christopher, since you're very new here, you can not know that this has changed in the past. This ticket is 2.5 years old, and at this time, it was not required.

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #9)
> (In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #8)
> > Christopher,
> > 
> > Steve is a long time Fedora packager, the FAS name is stevetraylen.
> > Everything's fine here.
> 
> Thanks, but I think he should put such info in the initial comment, why not
> help us?

Using IRC `.fas $EMAIL_ADDRESS` and `.fasinfo $FOUND_USERNAME` should give you some answer on this, too.  ;)

> I still need to await the anwser of targeting EL5 or not, because this will
> affect the macros will be used.

That is not a matter of el5...

One always can use conditionals in a spec-file for those macros like:

%{!?__python2 %global __python2 %{__python}}

and so on.  But I think supporting el5 would be a good idea for this.

> If Steven think it's inappreciable to answer such questions, please reassign.

You didn't even give him some time for response... You asked him today during midnight in CET (UTC +0100) and demand an answer until the morning hours.

(In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #11)
> That is not a matter of el5...
> 
> One always can use conditionals in a spec-file for those macros like:
> 
> %{!?__python2 %global __python2 %{__python}}
> 
> and so on.  But I think supporting el5 would be a good idea for this.

Why should we make spec like a mess? Don't you think they are eyesores?

Also I need a latest RPM to test if can be built on EL5 as EL5 ships a very old python version.

Hi,

Thanks for the comments, I'm closing, no longer interested in it basically.