Bug 689895

Summary:	ns-newpwpolicy.pl needs to use the new DN format
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Noriko Hosoi <nhosoi>
Component:	389-ds-base	Assignee:	Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.1	CC:	amsharma, benl, dpal, jgalipea, syeghiay
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	screened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	389-ds-base-1.2.8-0.7.rc2.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	689866	Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-05-19 12:42:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:	689866
Bug Blocks:	639035

Description Noriko Hosoi 2011-03-22 18:23:16 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #689866 +++

Description of problem:
The command-line utility ns-newpwpolicy.pl (template-ns-newpwpolicy.pl.in) hasn't been modified to adjust to the new DN format.

It escapes only ',' in the nested DN, in which '=' also needs to be escaped.

--- Additional comment from nhosoi on 2011-03-22 13:19:28 EDT ---

Created attachment 486852 [details]
git patch file (master)

Description:  template-ns-newpwpolicy.pl.in hasn't been modified
to adjust to the new DN format.  It escapes only ',' in the nested
DN, in which '=' also needs to be escaped.  This patch fixed it.

Comment 3 Amita Sharma 2011-04-07 07:21:39 UTC

Tested the Bug by executing the pwd policy test suit.
Bug is fixed, marking it as VERIFIED.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-19 12:42:50 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0533.html