Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 690079

Summary: [vdsm][storage]ConnectStoragePool (HSM) fails on a large scale deployment
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Moran Goldboim <mgoldboi>
Component: vdsmAssignee: Saggi Mizrahi <smizrahi>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Haim <hateya>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: abaron, bazulay, danken, iheim, sgrinber, yeylon, ykaul
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: vdsm-4.9-66 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 07:09:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 664432    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
vdsm log none

Description Moran Goldboim 2011-03-23 09:50:11 UTC
Created attachment 486991 [details]
vdsm log

Description of problem:
topology: 45 SDs (3 luns each) FC
connectStoragePool fails on HSM host:
Thread-159::ERROR::2011-03-23 11:35:38,313::sp::1059::Storage.StoragePool::(__rebuild) Unexpected error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 1054, in __rebuild
    self.refreshDomain(d, msdUUID, linkName)
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sp.py", line 988, in refreshDomain
    d.refresh()
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 918, in refresh
    self.refreshDirTree()
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 902, in refreshDirTree
    if self.isISO():
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 563, in isISO
    return name2class(self.getMetaParam(CLASS)) == ISO_DOMAIN
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 499, in getMetaParam
    for i in self.Metadata(cache=cache):
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/sd.py", line 482, in Metadata
    return self._metadata.metadata
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/metadata.py", line 110, in __getmetadata
    md = self._get()
  File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/blockSD.py", line 165, in _get
raise se.VolumeMetadataReadError("%s/%s: %s %s" % (self._vgName, self._lvName, msg, str(metadata)))


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-4.9-55.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 3 Dan Kenigsberg 2011-03-28 15:42:12 UTC
This flow will undergo major changes with bug 664432, please re-test when it's done.

Comment 6 Haim 2011-09-11 09:12:00 UTC
verified as a part of pool refactoring and performance improvement process.
tested several setups with different topologies such as:

- 1 pool with 1 SD with 60 LUNs via 2 paths. 
- 1 pool with 100 SD's 
- 1 pool with 4 SD's where each SD is combined from25 luns.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 07:09:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html