Bug 690179

Summary: [abrt] gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14: command_read_cb: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Brian Livermore <livermob>
Component: gvfsAssignee: Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: alexl, bnocera, tbzatek, tsmetana
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:264deeefef48f4c33618640413d3df52d22caeb6
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-30 13:40:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Brian Livermore 2011-03-23 14:21:49 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 16421 bytes
cmdline: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp --spawner :1.10 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/8
component: gvfs
Attached file: coredump, 35545088 bytes
crash_function: command_read_cb
executable: /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp
kernel: 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686.PAEdebug
package: gvfs-1.6.6-1.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/gvfsd-ftp was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1300889914
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.
2.
3.
no clue...
Comment 1 Brian Livermore 2011-03-23 14:21:53 UTC 
Created attachment 487050 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 abrt-bot 2012-03-30 13:40:12 UTC 
Backtrace analysis found this bug to be similar to bug #699944, closing as duplicate.

Bugs which were found to be similar to this bug: bug #526701, bug #533757, bug #547104, bug #558338, bug #566081, bug #568329, bug #574262, bug #577324, bug #581099, bug #585646, bug #588243, bug #598655, bug #606234, bug #627060, bug #628859, bug #635217, bug #649346, bug #652143, bug #653004, bug #657725, bug #659201, bug #669592, bug #699944

This comment is automatically generated.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 699944 ***