Bug 690191
| Summary: | Service with highest exclusive prio should be relocated to another node with lower exclusive prio | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Lon Hohberger <lhh> |
| Component: | rgmanager | Assignee: | Lon Hohberger <lhh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | cluster-maint, djansa, edamato, fdinitto, jwest, mjuricek, sbradley |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | rgmanager-3.0.12.1-2.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 680256 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 11:57:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 1
Lon Hohberger
2011-03-31 18:20:48 UTC
Description of problem: A two node cluster each running an exclusive service. The node rh51 is running the service demoProd(exclusive=1) and the node rh52 is running the service demoDevel(exclusive=2). The service demoProd fails a status check. Then it tries to restart the service on the node rh51(itself). Then service demoProd is stopped successfully. Then node rh51 fails to start the service demoProd. The service then is migrated to the "stopped" state. Patch merged to RHEL6 branch from STABLE31; already tested in RHEL57 branch: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git?p=cluster.git;a=commit;h=2cf74b34240e5830c49ecd1da7ce63f92026a2e4 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1595.html |