Bug 690198

Summary: cpuscaling test can fail a package, and still pass the system
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program Reporter: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Component: Test Suite (tests)Assignee: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.3CC: czhang, emcnabb, rlandry, ykun
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-05-09 16:11:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
cpuscaling patch fixing test logic for multiple packages. none

Description Greg Nichols 2011-03-23 14:54:19 UTC 
Description of problem:

The cpuscaling test has a logic error such that it the test will pass as long as the last package tested passes. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v7 1.3 R19

Example run:

http://beaker-archive.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/beaker-logs/2011/03/642/64210/131451/1436488/5594870///test_log-v7-cpuscaling.log
Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2011-03-23 15:01:20 UTC 
Created attachment 487062 [details]
cpuscaling patch fixing test logic for multiple packages.

Also, this patch improves some of the logging message, indicating cpu numbers.
Comment 8 Caspar Zhang 2011-05-01 10:03:42 UTC 
This bug does not need a Tech Note because of:

1. A Red Hatter reported it
2. It only happened in an intermediate version.
Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-05-09 16:11:49 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0497.html