Bug 690306

Summary: [abrt] control-center-1:2.91.92-1.fc15: __libc_message: Process /usr/bin/gnome-control-center was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: jimmy
Component: gnome-color-managerAssignee: Richard Hughes <richard>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 15CC: control-center-maint, mclasen, rhughes, richard, rstrode, saurabh.rawat90
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:ad9799c3f348a4382fed49ed3eb6cc34b1ed3ba4
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-04-27 13:10:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description jimmy 2011-03-23 20:38:08 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 41443 bytes
cmdline: gnome-control-center color
component: control-center
Attached file: coredump, 49647616 bytes
crash_function: __libc_message
executable: /usr/bin/gnome-control-center
kernel: 2.6.38-1.fc15.i686
package: control-center-1:2.91.92-1.fc15
rating: 3
reason: Process /usr/bin/gnome-control-center was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)
How to reproduce: I have a fresh install of the Alpha running for testing/peek-lloking on my ASUS EEEPC 1000H with stock equipment. Sorry for not being able to give more details. I run look around in the release and check things out.
time: 1300911185
uid: 500
Comment 1 jimmy 2011-03-23 20:38:11 UTC 
Created attachment 487144 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Saurabh Rawat 2011-03-25 02:08:20 UTC 
Package: control-center-1:2.91.92-1.fc15
Architecture: x86_64
OS Release: Fedora release 15 (Lovelock)


How to reproduce
-----
1.changed wallpaper
2.
3.
Comment 3 Richard Hughes 2011-04-26 10:16:06 UTC 
This doesn't have all the debug symbols that I need -- does this still happen with 3.0.0?
Comment 4 jimmy 2011-04-26 14:59:48 UTC 
I havent seen it since the 3.0.0. release.

(In reply to comment #3)
> This doesn't have all the debug symbols that I need -- does this still happen
> with 3.0.0?