Bug 690519
Summary: | Review Request: snappy - Fast compression and decompression library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, nathaniel, notting, susi.lehtola |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | susi.lehtola:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | snappy-1.0.0-3.fc14 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-03-29 03:55:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Martin Gieseking
2011-03-24 14:56:42 UTC
This looks pretty clean, assigning. rpmlint output: snappy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zlib -> lib, glib, z lib snappy.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://snappy.googlecode.com/files/snappy-1.0.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found snappy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zlib -> lib, glib, z lib snappy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is specified as ASL 2.0 in most of the source code files. - However, some files do not mention a license at all, just the copyright. - The included COPYING contains a BSD license. => License tag should read ASL 2.0 and BSD just to be on the safe side. Please ask upstream to clarify the licensing. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK 9d83bdcf0c79a8de608fa969c2909204 snappy-1.0.0.tar.gz 9d83bdcf0c79a8de608fa969c2909204 ../SOURCES/snappy-1.0.0.tar.gz MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - Although IMHO using CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -DNDEBUG" would be better. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add COPYING to %doc. - Please remove empty %doc line from -devel. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The following don't matter if you're not targeting older versions of EPEL. EPEL: Clean section exists. NEEDSWORK EPEL: Buildroot cleaned before install. NEEDSWORK EPEL: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A > - License is specified as ASL 2.0 in most of the source code files. > - However, some files do not mention a license at all, just the copyright. > - The included COPYING contains a BSD license. > => License tag should read ASL 2.0 and BSD just to be on the safe side. > > Please ask upstream to clarify the licensing. I already asked upstream to replace the BSD license text with the ASL 2.0 one: http://code.google.com/p/snappy/issues/detail?id=20&can=1 It's a known issue that has already been fixed in the SVN repo. This is also true for the missing/incomplete copyright info in the source files. Since the library is definitely licensed under ASL 2.0, I'd rather omit COPYING for now and add it as soon as a new release of snappy is available. > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK > - Although IMHO using > CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -DNDEBUG" > would be better. Sure. Fixed. > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSWORK > - Please remove empty %doc line from -devel. Done. New files: Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/snappy/snappy.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/snappy/snappy-1.0.0-2.fc14.src.rpm (In reply to comment #3) > I already asked upstream to replace the BSD license text with the ASL 2.0 one: > http://code.google.com/p/snappy/issues/detail?id=20&can=1 > > It's a known issue that has already been fixed in the SVN repo. This is also > true for the missing/incomplete copyright info in the source files. > Since the library is definitely licensed under ASL 2.0, I'd rather omit COPYING > for now and add it as soon as a new release of snappy is available. Great. I'd still ask you to ship the correct COPYING (with the explanation) as %SOURCE1 and ship it in %doc. Please do this before import to git. This package has been APPROVED > I'd still ask you to ship the correct COPYING (with the explanation) as
> %SOURCE1 and ship it in %doc.
Yes, that's not a problem and a good compromise. I'll add the file before importing the package into the Git repo.
Thank you very much for the immediate review!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: snappy Short Description: Fast compression and decompression library Owners: mgieseki Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). snappy-1.0.0-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snappy-1.0.0-3.fc14 snappy-1.0.0-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snappy-1.0.0-3.fc15 snappy-1.0.0-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. snappy-1.0.0-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. snappy-1.0.0-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: snappy New Branches: el5 el6 Owners: mgieseki npmccallum Git done (by process-git-requests). |