Bug 690744

Summary:	sandbox.conf.5.gz vs. /etc/sysconfig/sandbox
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component:	policycoreutils	Assignee:	Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	6.1	CC:	dwalsh, mgrepl
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 15:30:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Milos Malik 2011-03-25 09:59:51 UTC

Facts:
1. /etc/sysconfig/sandbox file is part of policycoreutils package.
2. /usr/share/man/man5/sandbox.conf.5.gz is part of policycoreutils-sandbox package.

Assumption:
Because sandbox option -C does not expect an argument and there is no other option which expects an alternative configuration file, I believe that sandbox.conf.5.gz is meant to describe /etc/sysconfig/sandbox file.

Description of problem:
1. Either the name of the man page is misleading (extra .conf) or the name of the config file is misleading (missing .conf).
2. The config file and its man page should be present in the same package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-debuginfo-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-gui-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-newrole-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-python-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-sandbox-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0

How reproducible:
always

Actual results:
(described above)

Expected results:
1) the name of the man page is in sync with the name of the configuration file
2) the configuration file and its man page are part of the same package.

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2011-05-26 15:00:41 UTC

Changed man page to be sabndbox.5.gz and moved it into the main package.

Fixed in policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.2.el6

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 15:30:25 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1637.html