Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Facts:
1. /etc/sysconfig/sandbox file is part of policycoreutils package.
2. /usr/share/man/man5/sandbox.conf.5.gz is part of policycoreutils-sandbox package.
Assumption:
Because sandbox option -C does not expect an argument and there is no other option which expects an alternative configuration file, I believe that sandbox.conf.5.gz is meant to describe /etc/sysconfig/sandbox file.
Description of problem:
1. Either the name of the man page is misleading (extra .conf) or the name of the config file is misleading (missing .conf).
2. The config file and its man page should be present in the same package.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-debuginfo-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-gui-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-newrole-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-python-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
policycoreutils-sandbox-2.0.83-19.7.el6_0
How reproducible:
always
Actual results:
(described above)
Expected results:
1) the name of the man page is in sync with the name of the configuration file
2) the configuration file and its man page are part of the same package.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1637.html