Bug 691083

Summary: [abrt] openoffice.org-brand-1:3.3.0-20.2.fc14: X11GlyphCache::GetInstance: Process /usr/lib/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: dani882
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: caolanm
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1ce3d330c0b45f9daedf83aa5a9d0e17370f09c3
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-04-18 13:54:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description dani882 2011-03-26 16:16:23 UTC 
abrt version: 1.1.17
architecture: i686
Attached file: backtrace, 28546 bytes
cmdline: /usr/lib/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin -quickstart -nologo -nodefault
component: openoffice.org
Attached file: coredump, 48164864 bytes
crash_function: X11GlyphCache::GetInstance
executable: /usr/lib/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin
kernel: 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.i686
package: openoffice.org-brand-1:3.3.0-20.2.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/lib/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1301122377
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
1.anything
2.
3.
Comment 1 dani882 2011-03-26 16:16:26 UTC 
Created attachment 487860 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2011-03-28 08:36:20 UTC 
I don't see any immediate reason why this would happen. Looks like the very first font request. Clearly this doesn't happen for me and for most people, so...
"how to reproduce: anything", does that mean it always happens for you ?, or just once ?
Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2011-04-17 22:18:09 UTC 
Can't reproduce this, there's no evidence that there are multiple threads going on in this area, but I don't like the look of X11GlyphCache::GetInstance with a multi-thread head on
Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2011-04-18 13:54:07 UTC 
upstream I've made sure this is threadsafe. I'm unconvinced that this is exactly the problem we have here, which I'm unable to reproduce. 

(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=2acdffcaa1f529955ac57bd773c906eb26fb9582)