Bug 691340

Summary:	Change the storage version number from 23 to 2
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	mkublin <mkublin>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	Saggi Mizrahi <smizrahi>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	yeylon <yeylon>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3	CC:	abaron, bazulay, iheim, lpeer, ofrenkel, pstehlik, sgrinber, srevivo, ykaul
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	CodeChange
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	vdsm-4.9-61	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 07:09:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	583430, 696475

Description mkublin 2011-03-28 10:00:37 UTC

Hi, please perform the following change :
Change the storage version number from 23 to 1.

(This bug is created as one of the requirements for feature at backend described at bug 583430)

Comment 2 Itamar Heim 2011-03-28 11:43:56 UTC

aren't we going with V1 for old format and V2 for new format?

Comment 3 lpeer 2011-03-28 16:14:24 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> aren't we going with V1 for old format and V2 for new format?

We wanted to but VDSM said that the old format must be 0 because that is the way it is deployed in the field.

Can we use 0 and 2 so we'll have in the backend V1==0 V2==2 and from now on we'll keep it in sync?

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2011-04-04 02:08:09 UTC

Since RHEL 6.1 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 5 Saggi Mizrahi 2011-04-10 13:48:01 UTC

Patches in gerrit:
http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/253

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 07:09:52 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html