Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
The RHEL6.1 candidate systemtap packages has 30 PASSes, 33 FAILs and 33 UNTESTED in
systemtap.base/sdt.exp testcase, while the 6.0.z systemtap has 32/32/32
here. This happens on ppc64, it does not happen on i686, unknown on s390x and
x86_64
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Environment:
kernel-2.6.32-122.el6
elfutils-0.152-1.el6
systemtap-testsuite-1.4-4.el6
Systemtap:
systemtap-1.2-11.el6_0 PASS
systemtap-1.4-4 FAIL
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cd /usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/
2. make RUNTESTFLAGS=systemtap.base/sdt.exp installcheck
3.
Actual results:
FAIL
Expected results:
PASS
Additional info:
systemtap.sum.diff:
-PASS: compiling sdt.c c89 -pedantic uprobe
-PASS: sdt c89 -pedantic uprobe
+FAIL: compiling sdt.c c89 -pedantic uprobe
+UNTESTED: sdt c89 -pedantic uprobe
systemtap.log.diff:
-PASS: compiling sdt.c c89 -pedantic uprobe
-executing: stap -w /usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.stp sdt.c.exe.2 -c ./sdt.c.exe.2
-PASS: sdt c89 -pedantic uprobe
+cc1: warnings being treated as errors
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c: In function ‘call9’:
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c:50: error: string length ‘542’ is greater than the length ‘509’ ISO C90 compilers are required to support
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c: In function ‘call10’:
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c:55: error: string length ‘579’ is greater than the length ‘509’ ISO C90 compilers are required to support
+compiler exited with status 1
+output is:
+cc1: warnings being treated as errors
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c: In function ‘call9’:
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c:50: error: string length ‘542’ is greater than the length ‘509’ ISO C90 compilers are required to support
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c: In function ‘call10’:
+/usr/share/systemtap/testsuite/systemtap.base/sdt.c:55: error: string length ‘579’ is greater than the length ‘509’ ISO C90 compilers are required to support
+
+FAIL: compiling sdt.c c89 -pedantic uprobe
+UNTESTED: sdt c89 -pedantic uprobe