| Summary: | [RFE] Have an option for quotacheck to not update atime | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <rdassen> |
| Component: | quota | Assignee: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.6 | CC: | rbinkhor |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-01 14:10:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 554476 | ||
|
Description
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
2011-03-31 08:14:21 UTC
I cannot reproduce it. quotacheck handles ext3 and ext4 differently. E.g. in case of ext4 with vsfv0 quota format it opens each file to get file descriptor to pass it to FIOQSIZE ioctl() to the get space occupied by the file including metadata (i-node). However it never accesses content of the file (read() system call), thus it should not update access time of the file. Which file system customer does use and how does he mount it? Corresponding line from /proc/mount would be helpful. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Closing this request because of lack of details how to reproduce this problem. |